Fortis Environmental Group, LLC

A Small Woman-Owned Business

Home

Services

Experience

Innovative Remedy Site

Hazarous Waste Site

LDA Excavation Site

Chemical Injection Site

Personnel

Robert (Bobby) Leger, PE

Pamela JW Jackson, PG

Laura Mooney

Brian Kelly, PE

Safety Culture

A Smaller Footprint

Certifications

Employment

Contact Us

Useful Links

Highway 98 Post Emergency Response Remediation

Chemical Injection Site

Wakulla County, Florida

 

KEY PROJECT POINTS

§        Monitor well installation

§        Remedial design

§        Wetlands

§        Permitting

§        Chemical Oxidant Injection

§        Site Closure


Chemical Injection Prep

PROJECT SUMMARY

In October 2003, a fuel-delivery truck was involved in a crash with a dump truck.  The incident occurred on US Highway 98 near the city of Newport, Florida.  The crash resulted in the release of over 8500 gallons of unleaded gasoline and up to 300 gallons of diesel fuel.  The emergency response contractor responded immediately to the spill and removed just over 660 tons of petroleum-impacted soil.  Additional assessment, conducted by another consultant in 2005, revealed that residual contamination remained in the soil and groundwater.  In 2006, Fortis was designated as the petroleum cleanup contractor for this site.

 

In April 2006, Fortis personnel supervised the installation of seven (7) shallow, single-cased monitoring wells and one (1) deep, double-cased monitoring well.  Due to the shallow water table (less than 2 feet) and the presence of an adjacent wetland, the monitor wells were designed to be viable and accessible even in the presence of standing water.  Most of the monitor wells were installed using hollow stem auger techniques; however three wells located within the wetland area were installed using a hand auger and jetting with potable water.  This approach prevented unnecessary damage to the wetland area.

 

During the well installation, a field scientist logged the description of soils at two (2) foot intervals.  Soil samples were also screened for organic compounds using an organic vapor analyzer per FDEP guidance.  A full round of water table elevations were collected, and then each well was purged and sampled.  The groundwater samples were analyzed using EPA Methods 8021B (BTEX and MTBE), 8270C (PAHs), and FL-PRO (TRPHs).  Results indicated that petroleum constituents remained present in the surficial aquifer at concentrations above cleanup target levels.  The levels were slightly above natural attenuation default concentrations and Fortis recommended monitoring for a six month period (two additional sampling events).

 

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (the regulatory and funding agency) concurred and after the additional monitoring results were obtained, Fortis personnel evaluated groundwater quality results, trends, and associated modeling and used this data to develop a remedial action plan (RAP).  The RAP was submitted in December 2006 and recommended In-Situ injection of a chemical oxidation agent to address the contaminated media.  The selected chemical agent was Cool-Ox©.  The Cool-Ox© Process uses calcium peroxide to generate the oxidizing radicals and subsequent oxygen enrichment.

 


Chemical Injection
The RAP was approved and the injection activities were implemented in March 2008.  Prior to the source area remediation activities, a FDOT right-of-way permit was obtained.  A round of baseline groundwater samples were also collected from site wells prior to injection activities.  Due to the shallow water table and sandy soils, the Cool-Ox© was injected directly into the water table using stainless steel probes.  This prevented the need to install injection wells.  Because the plume extends to both sides of US Highway 98, and work in the road was not permitted, the site was divided into two injection areas (one on each side of the highway).  Injection points were spaced 4-feet apart in a grid pattern on the side with the highest contaminant concentrations.  The spacing on the other side was increased to 5-feet centers, due to the lower concentrations and in an effort to control costs.  A total of 102 injection points were installed.
As of July 2009, four rounds of groundwater samples have been collected.  All contaminant concentrations have fallen below cleanup target level and most contaminants were not detected at all. 

Down-to-earth solutions for complex environmental problems

Website powered by Network Solutions®